If we have to
improve the
administration
of governments
anywhere, we
would have to
do some serious
introspection, do
a system analysis
and figure out
where the rub lies.
| |
Everyday, when I see many faceless citizens
approaching me for many of our acts and non-acts, I can’t help
asking myself a question whether it is possible for me to live up to
their expectations. The expectations that are huge while the
resources I have at my disposal are thin. To make matters worse, the
systems to administer these resources are primitive and inefficient.
Nonetheless, I would also be unsure as to how many of them are in a
position to approach me and how many would feel positively about the
prospects of their case if they could do so.
I know my own
constraints; sometimes I have lack of resources while sometimes the
manpower, sometimes there are vested interests not allowing it to be
done in a particular way while on few occasions the general lethargy
and casualness that has crept into our system is the major
impediment.
The vast apparatus of governance that we have,
has come to a state where it does not move without getting a push.
The unfortunate thing is that many of us don’t have the capacity or
the wherewithal to give that push. The systems of governance are
controlled by the powerful and influential; this needs to be
transformed to serve the requirements of all, whoever they may be.
This rhetoric might sound a bit clichéd, after all there are
so many who have been talking of this. What remains unaddressed
however, is that many of these issues have been getting swept below
the carpet without any visible change. Nobody is able to tell us
where the real action and the solution is. One thing is certain; the
solution does not lie in the talk and cannot be in pronouncements.
If we have to improve the administration of governments anywhere, we
would have to do some serious introspection, do a system analysis
and figure out where the rub lies. |
Every government department has two lives. One
that it lives internally and the other that it lives with its
clients, the citizens. Internally, the organizations suffer from
problems of malfunctioning due to lack of proper and smooth systems
while externally it makes its clients suffer. There are many in the
government who are extremely overworked while there are many more
who are woefully underworked or do not want to work. Due to this, it
is very difficult to distinguish where the disease is and who the
diseased is.
A thorough system analysis would however
confirm that nine out of ten times, both the prevention and cure of
this disease is possible only if we allow technology to take
precedence over the norm. Internally, technology solutions would
ensure that the non-performers can’t hide themselves and the
decision support systems are on a stronger wicket with properly
processed information base. Externally, technology would ensure that
the discretionary advantages and favors possible in the tech-less
system are eliminated allowing level playing field to everybody,
which in the essence, is the purpose of governments.
This
however does not mean that technology by itself can make governments
transparent, smart and responsive as there are host of other factors
that influence governance. But, it is also true that technology is a
sine qua non, an indispensable condition for achieving that.
To any casual observer, a government office is a place where
papers move or get stalled, affecting people. This information moves
through a huge hierarchy, giving scope to maneuverability at all
levels. This leads to imperfections in its processing
|